>

IT staffing company for ERP and niche technology roles

We are an IT staffing company built around one narrow problem: a generalist recruiter cannot tell a working SAP EWM consultant from someone who sat a course. As an ERP staffing company we screen with practitioners from the same module or platform, then place people under the engagement shape that actually suits the work — staff augmentation, a managed pod, Build-Operate-Transfer, or Employer of Record where you have no entity in the country yet.

3
Engagement shapes
11
Platform practices
CMMI 3
Appraised delivery
ISO 27001
Security certified

How an engagement can be shaped

  • Staff augmentation — you direct, knowledge stays with you
  • Managed pod — you buy an outcome, we direct the team
  • Build-Operate-Transfer — built, run, then handed to your entity
  • Contract, contract-to-hire or direct placement
  • C2C, W2 and 1099 in the US; licensed contract staffing in India
  • Employer of Record where you have no local entity
The problem

Most staffing failures are screening failures, not sourcing failures

A CV that says “SAP MM/WM” tells you almost nothing. The question is whether the person has configured a storage-type search sequence in EWM, or only run goods receipts in WM; whether they have worked in a system on S/4HANA with the Advanced ATP check active, or only on ECC; whether their FICO experience is new GL migration or month-end close support. A recruiter without module knowledge has no way to ask that, so the filter becomes keyword matching, and the cost lands on you three weeks into the engagement.

The same gap exists on every niche platform. On Salesforce, someone who has shipped inside a managed package with namespace constraints, packaging and ISV review is doing a different job from an admin who builds flows in a single org. On ServiceNow, ask a candidate to explain CMDB identification and reconciliation precedence — which discovery source is authoritative for which CI attribute — and the answer separates people who have owned a CMDB from people who have closed tickets in one. On data engineering, the question is whether they have handled late-arriving facts and backfill in a warehouse, not whether they list Airflow.

So our screening is done by practitioners from the relevant practice, not by the recruiter who sourced the candidate. We tell you which module and version the person has actually worked in, where the gaps are, and what we could not verify. That is a shorter shortlist than most suppliers send, and deliberately so.

Keyword-matched shortlistsTen CVs with the right acronyms and no way to tell which are real
Opaque marginYou are quoted a bill rate and never told the pay rate underneath it
Wrong engagement shapeA fixed-scope pod sold where you needed capability retained in-house
No continuity planA replacement arrives with no handover and the ramp-up is paid for twice
What we staff and how

Engagement models, contract models and the roles we place

Placements are made under our CMMI Level 3 appraised delivery framework with ISO 27001 certified information security. Our practitioners hold genuine vendor certifications in the platforms below.

IT staff augmentation — your team, your direction

Individual specialists join your existing team and take direction from your manager, your backlog and your ceremonies. This is the right shape when you want the capability and the system knowledge to stay inside your organisation after the engagement ends, and it is usually the cheapest of the three models because you are buying time rather than a managed outcome.

  • You set priorities, sprint goals and acceptance
  • Knowledge, documentation and configuration history stay with you
  • Scales one role at a time, no minimum pod size
  • Best when the work is continuous and the scope keeps moving

Managed pods and outcome-based delivery

You buy a result — a module rolled out, an integration suite delivered, a support SLA met — and we direct the team, manage its composition and absorb the churn. It costs more per head than augmentation because the management, the bench and the delivery risk are priced in, and it is the right trade when you do not have the bandwidth to run the team yourself.

  • Defined outcome, agreed acceptance criteria, our delivery lead
  • We handle attrition inside the pod without re-contracting
  • Suits discrete build or application support scopes
  • Distinct from managed services, which run a live estate

Build-Operate-Transfer and the dedicated development team

We recruit, host and run a dedicated development team in India for an agreed operate period, then transfer the people, tooling and knowledge into your own entity. BOT costs more than plain offshore augmentation during the operate phase and less than standing up a capability cold, because you are paying for someone else to carry the hiring and compliance risk while the team proves itself.

  • Recruit and operate under our entity, on your tooling and standards
  • Named transfer date, transfer terms and retention plan agreed up front
  • Offshore development team structure, your architecture and code ownership
  • The end state is a GCC of your own

Contract staffing in the US: C2C, W2 and 1099

These are materially different arrangements, not billing preferences. C2C (corp-to-corp) means we contract with your company and the consultant is employed or sub-contracted by us, so we carry employment obligations. W2 means the consultant is our employee, with withholding, benefits eligibility and statutory employer cost inside the bill rate. 1099 is independent-contractor treatment, and misclassification risk sits with whoever directs the work.

  • C2C staffing for agency-to-agency and vendor-of-record structures
  • W2 staffing where the consultant needs employer-of-record status and benefits
  • 1099 only where the engagement genuinely meets independent-contractor tests
  • Contract-to-hire IT with the conversion fee stated at the start, not at the end

Contract staffing in India under a licensed contractor

Deploying contract staff in India means statutory compliance, not just a rate card. We engage under contractor licensing where the headcount and state rules require it, and remit the statutory components rather than netting them into the rate. If a supplier's India rate looks unusually low, this is normally where the difference is hiding.

  • Provident Fund and ESI contributions remitted and evidenced
  • Professional Tax by state, and gratuity where tenure qualifies
  • Payslips, TDS and Form 16 handled — see payroll services
  • Compliance evidence available to your audit team on request

Gulf placements: visa sponsorship and WPS

In the UAE, Saudi Arabia and the wider Gulf, a placement is bounded by immigration and wage-protection rules before it is bounded by skills. The sponsoring entity, the labour-card activity and the emirate or region of the establishment all shape who can legally do the work, and salaries must be paid through the Wage Protection System from the sponsoring entity's own records.

  • Sponsorship and labour card issued by the entity that employs the consultant
  • Salary disbursed through WPS, on schedule and traceable
  • Onshore and offshore blends where sponsorship quota is the constraint
  • Client-site deployment rules checked before an offer is made

Employer of Record — hiring before you have an entity

EOR is regularly confused with staffing and is not the same thing. In staffing we find the person and often direct or co-direct the work. In EOR you have already chosen the person — frequently someone you interviewed yourself — and you need a legal employer in that country because you have no registered entity there. We become the employer of record; the work direction stays entirely with you.

  • You select the candidate, we employ them compliantly
  • Local contract, payroll, statutory benefits and termination handling
  • The usual bridge until entity incorporation completes
  • Details on the Employer of Record page

ERP and platform roles we place

Our practices are organised by platform so screening is always done by someone who has shipped in it. Volume hiring for permanent roles runs through a different motion again — a recruitment process outsourcing engagement rather than contract placement.

  • SAP: ABAP, Basis, FICO, MM, SD, EWM, SuccessFactors — see SAP services
  • Oracle Fusion, EBS and PL/SQL; Microsoft Dynamics 365, Power Platform, Azure and .NET
  • Salesforce admin, developer and architect; ServiceNow; Workday
  • Data engineering, DevOps, QA automation, AI/ML and full-stack
Choosing a model

Staff augmentation vs managed pod vs BOT vs direct hire

Staff augmentationManaged podBuild-Operate-TransferDirect hire
Who directs the workYour managerOur delivery leadOur lead, then yours after transferYou
Where knowledge ends upWith youWith the supplier unless you insist otherwiseWith you, by design, at transferWith you
Speed to startFastest — days to a few weeks per roleWeeks, pod assembled around a scopeSlowest — a recruitment programme, then operateSlowest for niche ERP roles; notice periods dominate
Cost profileLowest of the sourced options; time and materialsHigher per head — management, bench and risk priced inPremium during operate, then your own cost baseOne-time fee, then your payroll; cheapest long-run
Commercial riskYours — you own the planShared or ours, against agreed acceptanceOurs during operate, yours after transferYours
Best whenScope keeps moving and you want capability retainedDiscrete outcome and no bandwidth to manage a teamYou intend to build a permanent offshore centreThe role is core, permanent and long-horizon

Most estates end up with a blend: augmentation for the moving work, a pod for a bounded programme, direct hire for the roles that must stay permanent. We will say when augmentation is the wrong answer — if the work is a fixed, well-specified deliverable, a pod is usually cheaper for you than a line of contractors you have to manage.

How we deliver

From role intake to replacement cover

The stages below are where staffing engagements usually go wrong, so each one has a named output you can hold us to.

01

Role intake with the practice, not just the recruiter

We write the requirement with a practitioner from the relevant platform present: which module, which version, whether the work is greenfield configuration or support, and which two or three things the person must be able to explain unprompted. That becomes the screening script.

02

Practitioner technical assessment

Candidates are assessed by someone who has shipped in that platform. For SAP, module and release experience with specific configuration objects. For Salesforce, whether they have worked inside a managed package rather than a single org. For ServiceNow, CMDB identification and reconciliation precedence. You receive the assessment notes, including what we could not verify.

03

Background verification

Education, employment history, address and criminal-record checks, run to what is genuinely verifiable in the country. In India, education and employment verification depend on the institution or employer responding, and criminal checks are court-record searches by jurisdiction rather than a single national database — we report the scope actually completed, not a blanket pass.

04

Rate construction, stated openly

You see the pay rate, the statutory and employer costs, and our margin as separate lines. Bill rate minus pay rate is not a secret in a well-run engagement; a supplier who will not show you the split is usually protecting a number you would object to.

05

Onboarding and compliance activation

Contract executed under the right model for the geography, statutory registrations and remittances started, access and asset handover scheduled, and a named escalation contact on both sides before day one. For regulated client sites, site-specific clearances are completed before the start date rather than after.

06

Continuity, replacement and exit

Notice periods are written into the contract both ways. If a placement is not working, we replace rather than defend, and the outgoing consultant documents configuration decisions, open items and credentials handover before release. Knowledge transfer is a contractual deliverable, not a courtesy.

Related

Related workforce services

Questions we get

IT staffing questions we are asked most

What is the difference between staff augmentation and a managed pod?
In staff augmentation your manager directs the work, so the system knowledge and configuration history stay inside your organisation. In a managed pod you buy an agreed outcome and our delivery lead directs the team. Augmentation is normally cheaper per head because pod pricing carries management, bench cover and delivery risk. Pick augmentation when scope keeps moving; pick a pod when the deliverable is well specified and you have no bandwidth to manage people.
What is the difference between C2C, W2 and 1099 staffing in the US?
C2C is a corp-to-corp contract between your company and ours, with the consultant employed or sub-contracted by us. W2 means the consultant is our employee, so withholding, benefits eligibility and employer statutory cost sit inside the bill rate. 1099 is independent-contractor treatment and should only be used where the engagement genuinely meets independent-contractor tests, because misclassification exposure follows whoever directs the work.
How do you screen SAP consultants beyond the CV?
A practitioner from the same module runs the assessment. For EWM that means storage-type search and putaway strategy, not just goods receipt. For FICO we separate new GL migration experience from month-end support. We confirm release experience explicitly, because ECC and S/4HANA are different systems in daily practice. You receive the assessment notes with the gaps and anything we could not verify stated plainly.
Is Employer of Record the same as contract staffing?
No, and the two are often confused. In contract staffing we source the person and usually direct or co-direct the work. In EOR you have already chosen the person and need a legal employer in a country where you have no registered entity, so we employ them compliantly while all work direction stays with you. EOR is typically a bridge until your own entity incorporation completes.
What happens if a placement does not work out?
Replacement terms and notice periods are in the contract from the start, both ways. We replace rather than defend the placement. Before release, the outgoing consultant documents configuration decisions, open items, environment access and credential handover, and that handover is a contractual deliverable. The point is that you do not pay twice for the same ramp-up when someone leaves.
Will you show the pay rate behind the bill rate?
Yes, as separate lines: pay rate, statutory and employer costs, and our margin. Rate transparency matters because an opaque margin usually hides either an unsustainable pay rate, which shows up as attrition three months in, or statutory costs that were never remitted. If any staffing supplier refuses to show you that split, treat it as information about the engagement.
What background verification is actually possible in India?
Education and employment verification depend on the institution or former employer responding, and response rates vary. Criminal-record checks are court-record searches by jurisdiction rather than a single national lookup, so the scope has to be defined by the locations a candidate has lived in. Address verification can be done physically or digitally. We report the checks genuinely completed rather than issuing a blanket clearance.
Can you build an offshore development team we eventually own?
That is Build-Operate-Transfer. We recruit and run a dedicated development team in India under our entity, on your tooling, architecture and engineering standards, for an agreed operate period, then transfer the people and knowledge into your entity on a named date with transfer terms agreed up front. It costs more than plain offshore augmentation while we operate it, and the end state is a captive centre of your own.

Let's build what's next — together.

Whether it's setting up your India GCC, modernizing your enterprise stack, or hiring 50 engineers in 30 days — we'd love to scope it with you.