>

Enterprise GPT.

Private, secure LLM deployments over your enterprise data and policies — combining the power of foundation models with the safety of your information governance. Your knowledge, your policies, your control.

Private
Deployment
Enterprise
Knowledge
Policy
Aware
Auditable
Sessions

What Enterprise GPT Delivers

  • LLM access via your private cloud or on-premise
  • Grounded in your enterprise documents and data
  • Honors your role-based access controls
  • Full session audit and DLP compliance
  • Integrated with productivity tools and workflows
What It Is

A focused capability — delivered end-to-end

Deploy LLM capabilities inside your enterprise without compromising data security, policy compliance, or regulatory posture. Built on leading foundation models (GPT-4, Claude, open-source) with retrieval-augmented generation over your enterprise knowledge.

Private LLM Hosting

Foundation models in your VPC or on-prem — your data never leaves

Knowledge Grounding

RAG architecture over your documents, SharePoint, Confluence, wikis

Role-Based Access

Enterprise SSO, row-level security, document-level permissions

Productivity Integration

Slack, Teams, email, web UI — meet users where they work

DLP & Compliance

Data leak prevention, redaction, audit logging, GDPR/DPDP ready

Model Choice

GPT-4, Claude, Llama, open-source — pick what fits your workload

Engagement Model

How we deliver

01

Discovery

Assess your current state, identify gaps, scope the engagement against your goals and constraints.

02

Design & Build

Architecture, design, build, and integration — backed by CMMI 3 process maturity and CI/CD delivery practices.

03

Run & Optimize

Managed operations, continuous improvement, capability uplift, governance — partnership for the long haul.

← Back to Digital Transformation
Our Thinking

Perspectives on Enterprise GPT

How organisations are deploying private, domain-grounded large language models — and the architecture decisions that determine whether they deliver real value or remain a proof of concept.

🔒
Point of View

Enterprise GPT vs. Public LLMs: Why Data Sovereignty Is Non-Negotiable

When your proprietary knowledge base and customer data power your AI, public cloud APIs become a liability. We make the case for private LLM deployment — and explain when it is and is not necessary.

More insights
📚
Whitepaper

Building Your Internal Knowledge Base with RAG Architecture

Retrieval-Augmented Generation solves the hallucination problem while keeping LLMs grounded in your data. This paper covers the chunking, embedding, and retrieval decisions that determine accuracy.

More insights
📈
Case Study

The ROI of Enterprise AI: Measuring Impact Beyond Cost Savings

Productivity metrics alone undercount the value of Enterprise GPT. Our measurement framework captures time-to-decision, error reduction, knowledge retention, and competitive positioning.

More insights
✍️
Insight

Prompt Engineering for Business: Moving Beyond Simple Queries

The gap between a mediocre and an exceptional enterprise AI deployment often comes down to prompt design. We share the patterns our practitioners use across support, legal, finance, and HR use cases.

More insights
Questions we get

Before you ask

What is an enterprise GPT and how does it differ from a public chatbot?
An enterprise GPT is a large language model deployed inside your own cloud tenancy or data centre, grounded in your documents and governed by your access controls. A public chatbot knows nothing about your business, honours none of your permissions and leaves you no audit record. The underlying model technology is the same class; the governance around it is not.
Does our data stay private, and is it used to train the model?
Your content stays inside your boundary and is not used to train a foundation model. Deployment runs in your VPC or on-premise, so documents and prompts do not leave your environment. Every session is logged for audit, data-leak prevention and redaction rules apply on both input and output, and retention is configured to match GDPR and India's DPDP obligations.
Why use retrieval (RAG) instead of fine-tuning the model on our documents?
Retrieval keeps knowledge outside the model, so updating a policy means re-indexing one document rather than retraining. It also lets every answer carry citations, which is what makes output checkable. Fine-tuning changes tone, format and task behaviour effectively, but it does not reliably teach facts and it cannot enforce which user is allowed to see which document.
How do you stop it answering from documents a user is not allowed to see?
Permissions are enforced at retrieval, not in the prompt. Each indexed chunk carries its source document's access-control list, the user authenticates through your existing SSO, and the search filters to documents that identity can already open. Group membership syncs from your directory, so revoking access in the source system removes it from the assistant on the next query.
What drives the running cost of an enterprise GPT deployment?
Four things: tokens consumed per question, which retrieved context size and conversation length dominate; embedding and re-indexing load as your content changes; GPU or hosted-inference capacity if you run open-weight models yourself; and integration and support effort. Routing simple questions to a smaller model and capping retrieved context are the two changes with the largest cost effect.
How do you measure answer quality and control hallucinations?
With an evaluation set of real questions and approved answers, scored on groundedness — whether every claim traces to a retrieved source — relevance, and correct refusal when the answer is not in the corpus. Answers cite sources so users can verify them. Retrieval failures, not model failures, cause most wrong answers, so chunking, hybrid search and reranking get tuned first.

Let's build what's next — together.

Whether it's setting up your India GCC, modernizing your enterprise stack, or hiring 50 engineers in 30 days — we'd love to scope it with you.